Thoughts on Search Fund Economics

Lately I’ve been having a lot of conversations around investment terms with searchers, as well as investors.

About 15 years ago, I interned at a search fund.  And, over the last few years, I’ve started to invest in the asset class going direct as well as through funds of search funds.

Investing in search funds is a great way to scratch my entrepreneurial itch, extremely rewarding when a searcher finds success, and can be economically rewarding too.

This post is my attempt to share thoughts on self funded search economics in an effort to contribute to the search fund community, get feedback on my thinking from a wider audience, and of course meet more people who are doing searches/investing and may want to collaborate (please feel free to reach out!).

You can watch a video of me explaining this model here, and download the excel here:

Enterprise Value

The standard finance equation is enterprise value = debt + stock – cash.  Enterprise value is how much the company itself is worth.  Many times people confuse it with how much the stock is worth and find the “minus cash” part of this really confusing.

So, you can rearrange this equation to make it stock = enterprise value – debt + cash.  Make more sense now?

Enterprise value is just how much you’re willing to pay for the company (future cash flows, intellectual property, etc), not the balance sheet (debt and cash).

Most investors and searchers think about the EBITDA multiple of a company on an enterprise value basis because they’ll be buying it on a cash free, debt free basis.  It becomes second nature to think about EBITDA multiples and know where a given business should fall given scale, industry, etc.

However, I believe this second nature way of thinking of things can be a massive disadvantage to investors given the way EV and multiples are talked about in our community currently.

Sources of capital, the typical way to calculate enterprise value for self funded searchers

If you’ve ever looked at or put together a teaser for a self funded search deal, you will notice that the deal value is equal to the sum of the sources of capital minus deal fees and cash to the balance sheet.

As a simple example, if there is $4 mm of debt to fund the deal, $1 mm of equity, and $200k of deal fees, the enterprise value = $4 mm + $1 mm – 200k = $4.8 mm.

We’ll use slightly more complex numbers in our example: If a searcher is taking a $3.2 mm SBA loan, $850k seller note, putting in $120k themselves, getting $350k of equity from the seller, a $500k earnout, and $1.2 mm of equity financing minus $350k to the balance sheet and $250k of deal fees, then the enterprise value will be $5.62 mm.

Our example company has $1.5 mm of EBITDA, so the EBITDA multiple is 3.7x.  This is a pretty attractive acquisition multiple for a business that meets traditional search criteria (recurring revenues, fragmented competition, high gross margins, low customer concentration, etc).

If you’re seeing a search fund deal for the first time, the headline of “we’re buying a decent company for 3.7x, and replacing a tired owner with a hungry operator” is pretty exciting!

However, if you’re an investor, there is some nuance to this enterprise value number and the true EBITDA multiple you are investing in.

The trick with self funded enterprise value

The security that most self funded search investors get in a deal is participating preferred stock with a paid in kind dividend.  This means when there’s an exit, you get your money back before any other equity holder, then get a certain percent of the business, and whatever dividend you’ve been owed in the interim accrues to your principle.

It’s a really favorable security for the investor, and one that is basically impossible to get in VC where straight preferred stock is much more common (no pun intended).

The key terms are what percent of common equity does this security convert into after the originally principal is paid back, and what is the dividend.

The share of common equity the investor group will get typically ranges from 10-50% of the total common stock. The dividend rate is usually 3-15%.  The average I’m seeing now is around 30% and 10% for common and dividends respectively.

The strange this about the enterprise value quoted to investors in a teaser/CIM is that it doesn’t change as the percent of common changes, even though this has large implications for how much the common equity is worth and the value investors receive.

For example, I may get a teaser where the sources of investment – cash to balance sheet – deal fees = $3.7 mm for a $1 mm EBITDA company, which would imply a 3.7X EBITDA multiple. Let’s say the searcher is offering investors 30% of the common and a 10% dividend.

Let’s now say that the searcher is having a tough time raising capital and changes their terms to 35% of common and a 12% dividend. Does the effective enterprise value change for investors? I would argue yes, but I would be surprised to see it changed in the CIM/teaser.

This isn’t a knock on searchers or the search fund community. It’s just kind of how things are done, and I think this is mostly because it’s really hard to think about how the enterprise value has changed in this scenario.

However, the natural way of using EBITDA multiples to think about value for a business that is so common in PE/SMB can be extremely misleading for investors here. You may be thinking 3.7X for this type of business is a great deal! But, what if the security you’re buying gets 5% of the common?

If you’re in our world, you may counter this point by saying most searchers will also supply a projected IRR for investors in their CIM. However, IRR is extremely sensitive to growth rate, margin expansion, and terminal value. While the attractiveness of the security will be reflected, it can be greatly overshadowed by lofty expectations.

To get more clarity and have a slightly different mental model on the effective price investors are paying for this business, let’s go back to basics. Enterprise value should be debt + preferred stock + common stock – cash.

We know the values of each of these numbers, except the common. So, the main question here becomes: how much is the common equity worth?

Calculating value of common equity for self funded search funds

Equity value for most search fund deals = preferred equity from investors + the common equity set aside for the searcher and sometimes also advisors, board, seller.

We know that the preferred equity is investing a certain amount for a certain amount of common equity.  The rub is that they are also getting a preference that they can take out before any common equity gets proceeds, and they are getting a dividend.

So, the exercise of valuing the common equity comes down to valuing the preference and dividend.

In my mind, there are three approaches:

  • The discount rate method where you take the cash flows you’ll get in the future from the pref/dividends and discount them back at the discount rate of your choice.  I am using 30% in my model which I believe accurately compensates investors for the risks they are taking in a small, highly leveraged investment run by an unproven operator.  If you believe in efficient markets, this number also fits as it mirrors the historical equity returns as reported by the Stanford report, with a slight discount given this asset class has clearly generated excess returns relative to other assets on a risk adjusted basis, hence interest in these opportunities from an expanding universe of investors.
  • The second method is to calculate how much money you’d get from your preference and dividends, taking into account that per the Stanford study around 75% of search funds will be able to pay these sums, and then discount these cash flows back at a rate more in line with public equities (7% in my model).  This yields a much higher value to the preference/dividend combo, and therefore lowers the implied value of the common equity.
  • The last method is to just say nope, there is no value to the preference and dividend.  I need them and require them as an investor, but they are a deal breaker for me if they aren’t there, and therefore they don’t exist in my math.  This of course makes no logical sense (you need them, but they also have no value?), but I’ve left it in as I think many investors probably actually think this way and it creates a nice upper bound on the enterprise value. Side note, as with obstinate sellers, jerk investors are usually best avoided.

In our example, you can see a breakdown of the preference value, dividend value, and therefore common value and enterprise value for this deal.

In each case, the effective EBITDA multiple moves from 3.7x to something much higher (see the last 3 lines).

There are some simplifying assumptions in the model (no accruing dividend, all paid in last year), and some weird stuff that can happen (if you make the hold time long and the dividend greater than the 7% equity discount rate, the value of the dividend can get really big).

These flaws aside, I think this creates a nice framework to think through what the common is actually worth at close, and therefore what enterprise value investors will be paying in actuality.

It’s worth noting that the whole point of this is to benchmark the value you’re getting relative to market transactions in order to understand where you want to deploy your capital.

This creates a method to translate cash flow or EBITDA multiples of other opportunities on an apples to apples basis (if only there were a magical way to translate the risk associated with each as well!).

Another note, we could calculate the value of the common to be what this asset would trade at market today in a well run auction process minus any obligations (debt, preference, seller financing). However, I think that understates the option value inherent in this equity, a value that is only realized when a new manager takes over with more energy and know how.

There is a finance nerd rational for this. If you plot the value of equity in a leveraged company on a chart, it mirrors the payout of a call option. In both cases, the value of the security increases at a certain inflection point: when the value of equity rises above the strike price in an option, and when the enterprise value of a company rises above the debt level in a levered company.

I’ve (poorly) drawn the value of the equity (blue line) rising from $0 at the point where all debt is paid off at a slope of 1 as the value of the company increases ($1 in company value increases common by $1 after everything else is paid off). Similarly, a call option with a strike price at the same point on the x-axis will rise in a 1:1 ratio as the stock price increases (red line), crossing the x-axis after the initial premium is paid off.

The common equity of a highly levered company can therefore be valued by a similar methodology as the call option: Black Scholes. If you remember back to finance class, increasing volatility will increase the value of an option.

In the search fund case, we’ve (hopefully) increased the (upside) volatility and therefore create more value than simply selling the company today.

A few more thoughts on investor economics

There are a few other ways to think about the economics you get as an investor to best understand if this is the deal for you.

First, you may want to think about how much your investment will be worth day 1.  The key lever in this model is what discount this company is being bought for relative to fair market value. For example, the searcher may have proprietary sourced a great company and is buying it for 25% below what it would trade at in a brokered auction.

This is very much a “margin of safety” philosophy on things. Same with the calculation on how much you’ll receive in year 5 (after QSBS hits) assuming no growth in the business.

The only problem with each of these calculations is that they never play out in practice. Most companies don’t just stay the same, you’re either in a rising tide or you’re in trouble. And, you’re almost never going to sell in year 1, and definitely not for a slight premium to what it was bought for.

However, if your investment is worth 30% higher day one, and you can make a 20% IRR assuming nothing too crazy happens either way in the business, that’s not a bad place to start. Add in a strong searcher, decent market, some luck, and you’re off to the races.

Thoughts on searcher economics

A lot of this post has considered things from the investor perspective as my main quandary was related to how to create an EBITDA multiple that made sense for investors.

However, the point of this post is not to say searchers are misrepresenting or being unrealistic with their terms. In fact, I think it’s quite logical that self funded searchers capture the massive economic value that they do.

There are many reasons why self funded searchers deserve the lion share of the common equity.

First, they are providing a nice service of giving investors a positive expected value home to park their money with much lower correlation to the market than other asset classes ($1 mm EBITDA companies don’t see lots of multiple contraction/expansion throughout cycles).

Most money managers that fit that criteria are taking a 2/20, of course they also usually have a track record. So, I’ve used a 10% carry in my model, but stuck to 2% annual management fee.

The searcher spent a lot of time, and probably money, finding this company. That’s a lot of value, especially if it’s a below market price. They should be able to capture a lot of the value in finding a below market deal.

The searcher may be taking a below market salary, and needs to get comped like any CEO, with stock options. In my example model I have $1 mm of stock vesting over the hold period, as well as extra comp for taking a below market salary.

Searchers are also usually putting their financial standing at risk by taking a personal guarantee on the bank/SBA loan. This is really tough to put a number on, as is the last line in my framework where searchers are dinged for lack of experience. Like any good model, you need a few lines that you can fudge to make the math work 🙂

What you do think?

I’m shocked that I wrote all this. I was going to type a few paragraphs and a quick excel. However, putting this to paper has been a great exercise for me to sharpen my thinking.

Now I’d like you to help me further. Where do you think this should be changed in this framework? How do you think about things from the investor and/or searcher side?

Feel free to shoot me a note if you have thoughts (even just to tell me I’m being way too academic with this, which I actually agree with).

Lastly, a post like this is really a trap I’m putting on the internet to catch any like minded people in so that we can figure out ways to collaborate now or in the future. So, at the very least, connect with me on LinkedIn 🙂

6,133 Replies to “Thoughts on Search Fund Economics”

  1. Excellent weblog right here! Additionally your site quite a bit up fast!
    What web host are you the usage of? Can I
    get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my web
    site loaded up as quickly as yours lol

  2. Business Name: Philippines’ SEO Services
    Address: Block 4 lot, almar subd, 13 Champaca St, Novaliches, Caloocan, 1421 Metro Manila,
    Philippines
    Telephone Number: 0917 147 2031
    Website: pinoyseoservices.com

  3. Hi! I just want to offer you a huge thumbs up for
    your excellent information you have here on this post. I will be returning to your site for more soon.

  4. 1. Picture Hover Field – Create beautiful image boxes with eye-catching hover results and add essential pictures, colours, and texts
    and requires options with the assistance of Image
    Hover Box widget. Like different Thrive Themes instruments,
    Thrive Architect has a conversion-first focus with constructed-in elements that will help you create electronic mail opt-in varieties and drive actions.
    Popup/email decide-in plugin to grow your electronic mail list.
    This plugin used to be generally known as Visible Composer till the developer rebranded it to launch the
    fully separate Visible Composer plugin (see
    above). The brand new Visible Composer shares loads of similarities with Elementor.
    Visible Composer has a restricted free model that may be
    an acceptable different to Elementor’s free version. Thrive Architect
    is a web page builder plugin from Thrive Themes that gives a speedy inline enhancing
    expertise that may rival Elementor’s. Beaver Builder –
    an all-round solid different that gives limitless usage on all its
    premium plans. Elementor, Beaver Builder, Brizy
    and the WordPress default editor Gutenberg. In addition to Thrive Architect,
    Thrive Suite consists of Thrive Optimize (our review)
    that permits you to A/B take a look at your Thrive Architect designs, as well as Thrive Theme Builder, Thrive Leads (our evaluation), and
    extra.

    ELEMENTOR PRO WORDPRESS PLUGIN

  5. Right here is the perfect blog for anybody who hopes to find out
    about this topic. You know so much its almost hard to argue with you (not that I really
    would want to…HaHa). You definitely put a brand new spin on a subject that’s been written about for ages.

    Wonderful stuff, just wonderful!

  6. Hi! Do you use Twitter? I’d like to follow you
    if that would be okay. I’m definitely enjoying your blog
    and look forward to new posts.

  7. This is really interesting, You’re a very skilled blogger.
    I’ve joined your rss feed and look forward to seeking more of your wonderful post.
    Also,I have shared your site in my social networks!

    Bonus kasyno site kasyno online binus na start beez depozytu

  8. At this time it sounds like Drupal is the preferred blogging platform available right now.

    (from what I’ve read) Is that what you are using on your blog?

  9. I believe everything published made a ton of sense.
    However, consider this, suppose you were to create a killer title?
    I mean, I don’t wish to tell you how to run your website, but what if you added a title that
    makes people want more? I mean Thoughts on Search Fund Economics –
    Phil Strazzulla's Blog is a little boring. You ought to glance
    at Yahoo’s home page and note how they create article
    headlines to get people to click. You might add a related video or a related picture or
    two to grab people excited about everything’ve got to say.
    Just my opinion, it could make your posts a little livelier.

  10. Hi there friends, how is all, and what you desire to say regarding this article, in my view its in fact amazing designed for me.

  11. Hey I know this is off topic but I was wondering if you knew of any widgets I could add to my blog that automatically tweet my newest twitter
    updates. I’ve been looking for a plug-in like
    this for quite some time and was hoping maybe you would have some experience with something like this.
    Please let me know if you run into anything.
    I truly enjoy reading your blog and I look forward
    to your new updates.

  12. Hi there, just became aware of your blog through Google,
    and found that it is truly informative. I’m going to
    watch out for brussels. I’ll be grateful if you continue this {in future}.
    A lot of people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  13. Fantastic items from you, man. I have be mindful your stuff prior to and
    you are simply extremely great. I actually like what you’ve received right here, certainly like what you’re saying
    and the way during which you say it. You make it entertaining and you still take care of to keep it
    wise. I can’t wait to read much more from you. That is actually a wonderful site.

  14. The other day, while I was at work, my sister stole my iPad
    and tested to see if it can survive a forty foot drop, just so she
    can be a youtube sensation. My iPad is now broken and she has 83 views.
    I know this is totally off topic but I had to share it with someone!

  15. Greetings! I’ve been reading your site for a while now and finally got the courage to
    go ahead and give you a shout out from Houston Tx! Just wanted
    to mention keep up the good work!

  16. Hey I am so hapoy I found your webpage, I really found you by error, while I was browsing on Bing for something else, Anyways I am here now and would just like to say thanks
    a loot for a incredible post and a all round entertaining
    blg (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to browse it
    all at the minute but I have saved it annd also included
    your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a grea deal more,
    Please do keep up the excellent work.
    Casino na prawdziwe pieniadze website casino gra

  17. After looking into a few of the blog articles on your blog, I truly
    like your way of blogging. I book-marked it to my bookmark webpage list
    and will be checking back in the near future. Please visit
    my website as well and let me know what you think.

  18. Hello, i think that i saw you visited my blog so i came to “return the favor”.I’m attempting to find things to
    improve my site!I suppose its ok to use a few of your ideas!!

  19. Appreciating the time and energy you put into your site
    and detailed information you provide. It’s good to come across a blog every once in a while
    that isn’t the same old rehashed material.
    Fantastic read! I’ve bookmarked your site and I’m including your RSS feeds to my Google account.

  20. I do not know if it’s just me or if everybody else experiencing
    issues with your website. It appears as though some of the
    text in your posts are running off the screen. Can someone else please comment and
    let me know if this is happening to them as well? This may be a issue with my browser
    because I’ve had this happen previously. Thanks

  21. Hola! I’ve been reading your web site for a while
    now and finally got the courage to go ahead and give you a shout out from
    Kingwood Texas! Just wanted to tell you keep up the excellent job!

  22. This is a really good tip particularly to those new to the blogosphere.
    Brief but very accurate info… Thank you for sharing this
    one. A must read post!

  23. Hey there! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a
    quick shout out and say I truly enjoy reading through your posts.
    Can you recommend any other blogs/websites/forums that deal with the same topics?
    Appreciate it!

  24. You’re so interesting! I don’t think I’ve read through something like that before.

    So nice to discover another person with some genuine thoughts on this subject matter.
    Really.. thanks for starting this up. This website
    is something that is needed on the internet, someone with a
    bit of originality!

  25. My programmer is trying to convince me to move to .net from
    PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the costs.
    But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using
    WordPress on a number of websites for about a year and am nervous about switching to another platform.
    I have heard good things about blogengine.net. Is there a way I can transfer all my wordpress content into it?
    Any kind of help would be really appreciated!

  26. I do not know whether it’s just me or if everyone else
    experiencing issues with your website. It appears like some of the text on your posts are running off the screen.
    Can someone else please provide feedback and
    let me know if this is happening to them too? This could be a problem
    with my web browser because I’ve had this happen previously.
    Many thanks

  27. Hello friends, how is everything, and what you desire to say concerning
    this piece of writing, in my view its actually awesome designed for me.

    Feel free to surf to my web blog Ozempic

  28. Hello fantastic blog! Does running a blog such as this take a large
    amount of work? I have very little knowledge of coding but I was hoping to start my own blog in the near future.
    Anyways, should you have any recommendations or techniques
    for new blog owners please share. I know this is off subject nevertheless
    I just needed to ask. Kudos!

  29. I am no longer positive where you’re getting your information, however great topic.
    I must spend some time learning more or understanding more.
    Thank you for fantastic info I used to be searching for this info for my mission.

Comments are closed.